Hi, Thanks for your report. Well, it’s hard to tell if the bug comes from something transient (network?) as the ones in [1] or if it is not.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 19:27, Jacob K via Bug reports for GNU Guix <[email protected]> wrote: > jacobk@jacobk-K55A:~$ guix pull > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at > 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to df799a6 (4 new commits)... > Building from this channel: > guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git df799a6 > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... > 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > building > /gnu/store/f20in53sqrxchxi83hkav0aifs60w45v-compute-guix-derivation.drv... > Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... \Backtrace: > 14 (primitive-load > "/gnu/store/9hvkk03lwg9qakwm2ilcs4ykqfd4dq3h-compute-guix-derivation") > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 155:9 13 (_ _) > 159:9 12 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?) > ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _) > 152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _) > In guix/store.scm: > 2212:24 9 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0> > #<procedure 7fbaa011be10 at guix/self.scm:136?> ?) > 2040:8 8 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) > In guix/gexp.scm: > 300:22 7 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) > 1228:2 6 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) > 1095:2 5 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) > 936:4 4 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) > In guix/store.scm: > 2097:12 3 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) > 1434:5 2 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0> > #<procedure 7fbaa61989c0 at guix/store?> ?) > 1450:15 1 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0> > ("/gnu/store/3jld519qq13znrdmvg6ag2213mpbd396-guile-ava?" ?) ?) > 1450:15 0 (loop #f) > > guix/store.scm:1450:15: In procedure loop: > ERROR: > 1. &store-protocol-error: > message: "`/gnu/store/adg25ykma1my2s7587qaaxchwg7hbir4-guix-command > substitute' died unexpectedly" > status: 1 > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/9hvkk03lwg9qakwm2ilcs4ykqfd4dq3h-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "df799a61ef73451e587cb81942c7bfcbbade9e7e"; system: "x86_64-linux"; > host version: "4cc26df9583069a5b3e9a8b56049f76bed2138e6"; pull-version: 1). > Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <[email protected]>. Well, I do not know where does the dead substitute message come from? Do you have more information to share? Or was it very transient and hard to reproduce? Cheers, simon 1: toward a plan? (was Re: Reducing "You found a bug" reports) Simon Tournier <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:51:09 +0200 id:[email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-09 https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]
