The issue only happened once.My guess is that the error has something to do with a networking failure or possibly a problem with running out of RAM. At some point (before encountering this error) I think I installed a program to automatically kill programs when low on memory, and I see in htop now that `earlyoom -r 60` is running, but I'm not sure if that's the program I installed or if that comes default with Trisquel. I have 8GB of RAM with somewhere between 4GB and 16GB of swap RAM at the time of the error.
I like the proposal in the thread you linked to ([1]). - Jacob K On 4/11/25 11:12, Simon Tournier wrote:
Hi, Thanks for your report. Well, it’s hard to tell if the bug comes from something transient (network?) as the ones in [1] or if it is not. On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 19:27, Jacob K via Bug reports for GNU Guix <[email protected]> wrote:jacobk@jacobk-K55A:~$ guix pull Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to df799a6 (4 new commits)... Building from this channel: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git df799a6 substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% building /gnu/store/f20in53sqrxchxi83hkav0aifs60w45v-compute-guix-derivation.drv... Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... \Backtrace: 14 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/9hvkk03lwg9qakwm2ilcs4ykqfd4dq3h-compute-guix-derivation") In ice-9/eval.scm: 155:9 13 (_ _) 159:9 12 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _) 152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _) In guix/store.scm: 2212:24 9 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0> #<procedure 7fbaa011be10 at guix/self.scm:136?> ?) 2040:8 8 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) In guix/gexp.scm: 300:22 7 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) 1228:2 6 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) 1095:2 5 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) 936:4 4 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) In guix/store.scm: 2097:12 3 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0>) 1434:5 2 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0> #<procedure 7fbaa61989c0 at guix/store?> ?) 1450:15 1 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7fbab6edf0a0> ("/gnu/store/3jld519qq13znrdmvg6ag2213mpbd396-guile-ava?" ?) ?) 1450:15 0 (loop #f) guix/store.scm:1450:15: In procedure loop: ERROR: 1. &store-protocol-error: message: "`/gnu/store/adg25ykma1my2s7587qaaxchwg7hbir4-guix-command substitute' died unexpectedly" status: 1 guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/9hvkk03lwg9qakwm2ilcs4ykqfd4dq3h-compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "df799a61ef73451e587cb81942c7bfcbbade9e7e"; system: "x86_64-linux"; host version: "4cc26df9583069a5b3e9a8b56049f76bed2138e6"; pull-version: 1). Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <[email protected]>.Well, I do not know where does the dead substitute message come from? Do you have more information to share? Or was it very transient and hard to reproduce? Cheers, simon 1: toward a plan? (was Re: Reducing "You found a bug" reports) Simon Tournier <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:51:09 +0200 id:[email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-09 https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]
1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-09/msg00059.html
OpenPGP_0x8EF548378E806320.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
