Michael Kelly, le jeu. 05 mars 2026 19:44:23 +0000, a ecrit: > On 05/03/2026 13:53, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Michael Kelly, le jeu. 05 mars 2026 13:51:08 +0000, a ecrit: > > > 2) The package versions of those in my sample are moving on and failing > > > build dependencies. I can remove the odd one but that defeats the point of > > > reproducing the build sequence that boralus used. Is it realistic for me > > > to > > > somehow setup a repository that has copies of packages that I can rely on? > > You can use a snapshot.debian.net snapshot to always use the same set of > > available packages. > > What an amazing resource. I had no idea that snapshots were taken so > frequently. > > There's a sequence of 33 package built by boralus between 28/02/26:2327 and > 01/03/26:0411 so I've selected the following for the core of the chroot and > for the apt configuration: > > deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/20260228T200326Z sid > main > deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/20260228T200326Z > unreleased main > deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/20260228T200326Z > experimental main > deb-src http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20260228T200326Z sid main > > The first 11 packages build but I can't build haskell-skylighting due to > unmet dependencies: > > libghc-skylighting-core-dev-0.14.7-ec73a is available > > but > > libghc-skylighting-core-dev-0.14.7-4725a seems to be required. > > Can someone explain this to me? Is it to do with the 'incoming' > repositories?
Possibly. Or possibly the buildd had it in its cache. Samuel
