Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we really want to use program_invocation_short_name here and not
> program_invocation_name? When listing a error, it is common to get
> the filename of the failing program. It is a minor issue, you don't
> need to change it right now, the person who commits can do it or
> whatever.
It was discussed a while ago on gnulib list, and the consensus was,
indeed, to use program_invocation_name in error messages.
> +ARGP_PROGRAM_DATA("ifconfig", "2007", "Marcus Brinkmann")
>
> Missing semi-colon at the end of the macro (screws up indenting
> tools).
Yes, here are my 2 cents in favor of the semicolon, too:)
Regards,
Sergey
_______________________________________________
bug-inetutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
