Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ifconfig/system/osf.c: > > The documentation in the older code suggests that an address family > can be specified just after the name of the interface has been > specified:
Yes, it is a standard practice to use something like ifconfig eth0 inet 213.130.0.1 .... > Isn't this a discrepancy? Yes, it is. > If yes, which one is to be followed? I believe the traditional style should be supported. Regards, Sergey _______________________________________________ bug-inetutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
