Hi Simon, On 3/22/24 12:51 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi. Nice catch, thank you. I have added a CI/CD job to catch -lsystemd > regressions in the future:
Nice, looks good to me. > Thank you for details -- I think this is somewhat subjective, but I do > prefer to augment as specific LDADD's as possible when it is known how > to do so. If the library was used by 75% of the binaries, I wouldn't > had bothered, but I think this is a small enough subset to care about. Yes, good point. Just to double check I reconfigured and run 'make all && make check' and everything works as expected. Thanks. > I pushed the following patch in your name, adding a NEWS entry and the > moniker 'tiny patch' to indicate that signing copyright papers are not > necessary. I appreciate you taking the time to prepare a patch, though, > and would be happy if you continued to do so, and then copyright papers > will be required at some point so let me know off-list and I'll send you > the proper form to fill out. Thanks! Yes, it would be nice to have copyright papers submitted so I can submit patches again in the future. I just recently signed them for gnulib since I started working on gnulib-tool.py. I imagine it is the same process as that but s/gnulib/inetutils ? Feel free to email me off-list. Collin
