Collin Funk <collin.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Simon, > > On 3/22/24 12:51 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Hi. Nice catch, thank you. I have added a CI/CD job to catch -lsystemd >> regressions in the future: > > Nice, looks good to me. > >> Thank you for details -- I think this is somewhat subjective, but I do >> prefer to augment as specific LDADD's as possible when it is known how >> to do so. If the library was used by 75% of the binaries, I wouldn't >> had bothered, but I think this is a small enough subset to care about. > > Yes, good point. Just to double check I reconfigured and run > 'make all && make check' and everything works as expected. Thanks.
Great! >> I pushed the following patch in your name, adding a NEWS entry and the >> moniker 'tiny patch' to indicate that signing copyright papers are not >> necessary. I appreciate you taking the time to prepare a patch, though, >> and would be happy if you continued to do so, and then copyright papers >> will be required at some point so let me know off-list and I'll send you >> the proper form to fill out. > > Thanks! Yes, it would be nice to have copyright papers submitted so I > can submit patches again in the future. I just recently signed them > for gnulib since I started working on gnulib-tool.py. Upgrading inetutils to use gnulib-tool.py would be nice. As a start, I bumped the gnulib submodule. > I imagine it is the same process as that but s/gnulib/inetutils ? Feel > free to email me off-list. Done. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
