>>>>> "Rune" == Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rune> Citat Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> So is the bug that \convert-ly produces broken code, or is the bug that
>> the \oldaddlyrics command is broken?
Rune> The latter.
Rune> \oldaddlyrics is broken.
>> (if it's the second case, then why mention convert-ly at all?
Rune> Because \oldaddlyrics is not mentioned in the NR - its use is
discouraged.
Rune> The command is only there because of convert-ly.
I would also consider it a bug that convert-ly creates code using a
deprecated function. If the deprecated function actually worked, it
would be a less serious bug, but still a deficiency.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
