On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:42:26 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And what about renaming \times to \tuplet? ;)
I think that everybody agreed with it. Some people wanted a weird
\tuplet 3:4 { } syntax as well, but after discussion it was
pointed out that this wouldn't work in scheme.
Certainly everybody agreed that \times -> \tuplet was good.
However... since this change _will_ change so many files, could
you prepare a diff and/or push to your local git branch, then
check on -devel for any last-minute objections?
(don't include running convert-ly in the "discussion patch"; just
include the change to the parser, the convert-ly rule, and maybe the
NEWS item as well)
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
