[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue 569: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=569

Comment #1 by hanwenn:
I prefer to go for beam-thickness ; I think doc strings with exceptions and
properties with different 'types' are messy
Fine with me! Note, though, that this example is just one of many, where the
same property name is reused for many different purposes and different
sets of allowed values for each purpose. The most striking example is probably the "style" property, where the current documentation is extremely uninformative
for this reason.

  /Mats


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to