2008/2/7, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Issue 569: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=569 > > > > Comment #1 by hanwenn: > > I prefer to go for beam-thickness ; I think doc strings with > > exceptions and > > properties with different 'types' are messy > Fine with me! Note, though, that this example is just one of many, where the > same property name is reused for many different purposes and different > sets of allowed values for each purpose. The most striking example is > probably > the "style" property, where the current documentation is extremely > uninformative > for this reason.
You have a point there. However, the 'style setting does not have a reasonable default (like "measured in linethickness"). It should be documented in the respective grob-interface. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
