> However, note that aclocal.m4 is part of stepmake/, which was once
> designed to be a lilypond-independent modular simple makefile-build
> system.
>
> Forcing c++ would remove that feature...
Do you really consider it a good idea that a4local.m4 is part of the
build system (i.e, stepmake) instead of the package itself? Or is
there a different m4 file used for package specific configuration?
And finally, is the stepmake project itself still alive, possibly used
by another project? I've always wondered about the additional
complexity of the makafiles...
Werner
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
