On 2009-11-02, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:07:48AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > The second case is much more likely. Graham, I don't want to bug you > > with this, but would you mind checking the log for mingw::lilypond to > > see if configure detects the mbrtowc() function? On my Linux system, > > the output is > > > > checking for mbrtowc... yes > > I have > ac_cv_func_mbrtowc=yes > ac_cv_search_mbrtowc='none required' > and also > #define HAVE_MBRTOWC 1 > > Dunno what that second line means.
Okay, that means mbrtowc() is supported and the preprocessor macro HAVE_MBRTOWC is enabled. So my guess was wrong. :-( I plan on removing this function (due to the FIXME) and use a simpler approach instead that should not have these problems. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
