On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:06:46AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On 2009-11-02, Graham Percival wrote: > > I have > > ac_cv_func_mbrtowc=yes > > ac_cv_search_mbrtowc='none required' > > and also > > #define HAVE_MBRTOWC 1 > > > > Dunno what that second line means. > > Okay, that means mbrtowc() is supported and the preprocessor macro > HAVE_MBRTOWC is enabled. So my guess was wrong. :-(
The first and third lines mean that, yeah. But the 'none required' -- does that mean "no extra measure are required, since we have the normal mbrtowc" ? That seems like a weird interpretation, but this would hardly be the first time I've seen a difficult-to-understand compiler or configure message. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
