On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > У пт, 2010-02-12 у 04:08 +0000, Ruben Zilibowitz пише: >> <lilypond >> > >> >> as the lilypond tag, even though it is a valid way to write it. > > If it is the case (i've not tested so far), it may be considered as a > bug (since sgml/html accepts any number of any "space symbols" before > ">", as far as i know).
Yes. HTML is whitespace-insensitive. > But is it necessary to recognize such cases, really? If You need it, > please let me know. Since lilypond-book is supposed to handle HTML files, and that's part of HTML, we should handle it. > Now i would rather consider it as a limitation, and would suggest to > mention this in the Notation Reference. (Thought it may be not too hard > to fix?..) I don't think it should be a @knownissue. This isn't a deliberate limitation of lilypond; it's a bug. Please add it as type-scripts priority-low frog, and add a note that I estimate that it would take 30 minutes for a frog to fix (assuming the frog knows python) see the format for issue 1008 or 1009 or 1010 (I can't remember the number) if you're uncertain about what I mean by the frog stuff. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
