Comment #15 on issue 602 by will.fitzgerald: Feature request: better
support for Sacred Harp notation
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=602
My vote is "yes," too. But I don't think the thin shape heads are
necessary, and are
not there by design, but by lack of design. In fact, including them might
suggest
there is a 'tradition' of thin shape heads, but I think it's really a
question of
what previous engravers were willing to do. Nobody, for example (as far as
I know)
went back and changed the round notes in 4- or 7-shape books to thin shapes.
I will, however, send a note to Karen Willard (who designed the font a lot
of people
use) to see if she thinks differently.
And thanks again -- this is very good stuff.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
