Hi, Joe,
this is following a problem on -user which Kieren helped me to solve
(mostly).
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-06/msg00309.html>
I think I stumbled across an inconsistency of bottom-system-spacing, though:
From the docs (NR 4.1.2), bottom-system-spacing should specify the
spacing to the top of the bottom margin. From my experiments however,
it seems that only minimum-distance behaves this way, while padding
relates to the top of the /footer/ instead.
While I actually prefer the way padding works, I'm unsure whether that's
a bug or not. In the latter case: should minimum-distance also relate
to the top of the footer, for consistency? I attach a snippet showing
the behaviour - try to comment out line 14 to see what I mean.
By the way, is it correct and desired that foot-separation does not
exist anymore?
Cheers,
Alexander
\version "2.13.24"
\pointAndClickOff
low = { \repeat unfold 23 { c''1 } c1 }
high = \repeat unfold 24 { c''1 }
\paper {
ragged-last-bottom = ##f
%% padding relates to the top of the footer,
bottom-system-spacing = #'((minimum-distance . 0) (padding . 0))
%% while minimum-distance relates to the top of the bottom margin.
bottom-system-spacing = #'((minimum-distance . 5) (padding . -inf.0))
oddFooterMarkup = \markup {
\with-color #red \filled-box #'(20 . 90) #'(0 . 5) #0
}
evenFooterMarkup = \markup {
\with-color #green \filled-box #'(20 . 90) #'(0 . 3) #0
}
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\low \pageBreak
\high \pageBreak
\low \pageBreak
\high \pageBreak
\high \pageBreak
\low \pageBreak
}
}
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
