The regtest or the behaviour?
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
"Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Thanks, changed in git. It should look different in 2.13.27.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
Carrying on looking at documenting undocumented regtests and came across
chord-scripts.ly. It looks from this as if the regtest is trying to
demonstrate placement of scripts above and below the chord. Unfortunately,
this doesn't seem to work. There's also what seems to be a bug in the
regtest itself, with the line < c_^ e^^ > 4 being repeated, instead of one
occurrence being < c_^ e_^ > 4 which I guess is what's needed. If someone
can confirm these are bugs, I'll raise reports.
\relative c''{
<c^^>4
<c_^>4
c^^
c_^
}
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
