The regtest has been changed to test ^ _ and _ ^ . No code has been changed; if .27 looks bad (well, if there's a mismatch between text and graphics), then please add an issue.
Cheers, - Graham On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > The regtest or the behaviour? > > -- > Phil Holmes > Bug Squad > > > "Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > Thanks, changed in git. It should look different in 2.13.27. > > Cheers, > - Graham > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Carrying on looking at documenting undocumented regtests and came across >> chord-scripts.ly. It looks from this as if the regtest is trying to >> demonstrate placement of scripts above and below the chord. Unfortunately, >> this doesn't seem to work. There's also what seems to be a bug in the >> regtest itself, with the line < c_^ e^^ > 4 being repeated, instead of one >> occurrence being < c_^ e_^ > 4 which I guess is what's needed. If someone >> can confirm these are bugs, I'll raise reports. >> >> \relative c''{ >> <c^^>4 >> <c_^>4 >> c^^ >> c_^ >> } >> >> >> -- >> Phil Holmes >> Bug Squad >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bug-lilypond mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
