On 4 August 2010 08:54, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > One of your vital tasks -- arguably even more important than > replying to emails -- is to check the regtest comparison for every > release.
There's something fishy about the latest comparisons: a number of .log changes suggest broken regtests, and if you check collated-files.html, they are visibly broken (e.g., bookparts.ly: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/collated-files.html#bookparts.ly); but they appear to be false positives (at least for the mingw binary and master). Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
