On Wed 04 Aug 2010, 20:23 Neil Puttock wrote: > There's something fishy about the latest comparisons: a number of .log > changes suggest broken regtests, Sorry, could not catch that --- what exactly in test output[1] suggests broken regtests?
Would anyone explain me, please? I've looked again in the manual[2] and couldn't find any relevant information. (Probably, something should be added to the docs, too?..) Thanks! > and if you check collated-files.html, > they are visibly broken (e.g., bookparts.ly: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/collated-files.html#bookparts.ly); > but they appear to be false positives (at least for the mingw binary > and master). ________________________________ 1. http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.29-1/compare-v2.13.28-1/index.html 2. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/precompiled-regression-tests#Regression-test-comparison -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
