Werner LEMBERG <wl <at> gnu.org> writes:

> > (Accented characters are also accepted, but that's not documented an
> > probably not a good idea either.)
> 
> Why not?  Since lilypond accepts UTF-8 only, I don't see any problem,
> except unveiling potential guile bugs.
> 

Why not?  Only because the capability is un-documented;
those mean old programmers might take it away in the next release.



_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to