Comment #6 on issue 1701 by [email protected]: default accidental style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
I believe the [wikipedia] source quoted in that message is wrong.
Well, that is too strong a statement. It says that "some composers put a natural" in front of ges following gis. Probably some composers do, but I have never seen it.
Has anyone seen the extra natural without a preceding double-accidental consistently that it might have been standard?
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
