Comment #5 on issue 1716 by [email protected]: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1716
So are you comfortable with a genera rule that says something like "If a user knows enough to play around with internal properties, they know enough to deal with the elimination of internal properties without us giving them an indication"?
I'd be perfectly happy with this rule. The internal properties are quite well hidden in the IR, and in many cases it's not really clear how they might be useful without consulting the source code.
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
