Comment #7 on issue 1716 by [email protected]: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1716

+1 At the absolute minimum we aught to be saying

[internal function] is no longer supported and will be [ignored/deleted/whatever] please refer to [documentation/whatever] for more information.

Something like that.

Also, in some ways that could be construed as 'useful' documentation for anyone, I mean if someone is running convert-ly in the first place it is not a huge leap for them to 'read' the file in an editor or text viewer and see the list that no longer exists.




_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to