Comment #15 on issue 1110 by [email protected]: Wrong octave of repetition chord
with \relative and #{ #} syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
Yes, you are naive. q is processed much earlier, in the lexer and parser.
But do you really want to have
\relative c' { <a' c e> q }
equivalent to
\relative c' { <a' c e> <a' c e> }
? Think about it. Or
\relative c' { <a c e> c e q }
equivalent to
\relative c' { <a c e> c e <a c e> }
? That means that you _manually_ have to track the progress of pitch
octaves, and compensate, and I don't even think that q' or q, are valid
commands.
Basically, you are proposing to restart with the very first implementation
of q, and then reopen all related closed bug reports in sequence again. I
doubt we'll end up somewhere else.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
