On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 03:53:03AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > I don't particularly like "Patch-needs_work: Review has identified > some problems" status when the only "problem" is that the patch is > based (and consequently blocked) on another patch.
fine, I invented a Patch-waiting: Patch is blocked, but still needs review I'm not convinced that 7 different patch levels is great; the more labels we have, the harder it is to capture their status at a glance. But I agree that the previous situation was sub-optimal, and I'm not interested in discussing any optimal solution at the moment. We can revisit this in GOP in 2012. - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
