<lilypond <at> googlecode.com> writes: > > I expect the problem is Mike's uninitialized variable, not this patch, but > I'll move this back to New and re-test. >
Just clarifyling to be fair, it is not Mike's uninitialized variable (or other intermittency-causing bug). Mike was merely unfortunate enough to write a couple reg-tests that suffer from issue 1723 (and stubborn enough to refuse to let me edit the reg-test to work around the bug). We found issue 1723 occurrences as far back as version 2.12 _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
