<lilypond <at> googlecode.com> writes:
> think I've found the problem. Dot_column::calc_positioning_done, which is > chained to dots as an x_parent_positioning callback, calls position_less. > This is lethal - it looks up unpure Y extents at a time where they need to > be calculated purely. I have no clue how lilypond survived for so long > without this surfacing. > Well, the dots are only calculating their staff-position, the integer that says which line or space their parent note is on. I don't know if that is pure or not, but it seem that it should be known before line-breaking. Or, I could just removing the piece of code that depends on dots' staff- position, and I still see bug 2180. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
