Le 21/06/2012 18:24, Phil Holmes a écrit : > This doesn't help you, but for my money, both inversions are > incorrect. Correct inversions would look as attached. Wonder if it's > an artifact from relative note placement?
You are right, "theoretically" any inversions could be used, but in theory, you could also use 4-octave-wide inversions, and this would be absurd, because few instruments can play on 4 octaves. I think there is a glitch in Lilypond's inversions, but I may be proven wrong. If so, there should be a warning in the documentation. Moreover, imho, most piano composers would take my definition, not Lilypond's, because it is natural on a piano not to go beyond one octave for one hand. If I want <c/e> on the right hand, I don't want it to be spread across 2 octaves. Thank you for your useful image! -- Nucleos _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
