On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Nucleos <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > c major is : <c e g> > > The first inversion would be <e, g, c>. This is what I call c/e. > The second inversion would be <g, c e>. This is what I call c/g > > The code below triggers nevertheless Lilypond 2.14.2 to display <e, c g> > -- which is 2 octaves wide ! > > Weirdly, Lilypond seems to think my definition of inversions is right > for c/g (it displays <g, c e>), but uses a weird definition for c/e. Why > is that? > > The code : > ******************** > > \version "2.14.2" > > { > > \chordmode { > > c1 c/e c/g > > } > > } > ******************** > > > I suggest the behaviour should be: > 1) build the chord "c" is <c e g> > 2) when the bass of the chord is given, take this bass and then follow > the natural order of "c e g c e g c e g"... and display three successive > notes of that sequence. > > > Cheers, > > -- > Nucleos
Thank you for your report, Nucleos. This, and your discussion with Phil Holmes, have been entered as Issue 2617, with a comment : http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2617 Ralph _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
