There's a link to it in the original email (below). If you need me to send you one expressly, feel free to email me personally.
Aaron Laws On Aug 23, 2012, at 5:31, Colin Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:29:10AM -0400, Aaron Laws wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Colin Hall <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:13:46PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >>>> On 2012-08-21 17:56, Aaron wrote: >>>>> I used a Choir Staff to typeset http://sdrv.ms/SNz2VO (if you need the >>>>> code, let me know). >>>>> My friend also used Choir Staff at a different size in a different >>>>> score with the same result. >>>>> The problem is that the vertical bar at the left of the system >>>>> is not seamlessly attached to the flanges at the top and bottom. >>>>> I'm accustomed to this type of problem on screen due to aliasing >>>>> issues or whatever else, but the problem persisted after printing. >>>>> >>>>> A much smaller issue is that after printing, the barlines are >>>>> slightly taller and shorter than the staff. >>>> >>>> I cannnot see the problem here on a Linux machine with the okular >>>> PDF viewer. Here the vertical line and the flanges are perfectly >>>> attached and the barlines do not exceed the staff lines. >>>> >>>> I would guess that this is a problem with your PDF viewer rather >>>> than with lilypond. >>> >>> Thanks for the help, Reinhold. >>> >>> Aaron, thanks for taking the time and effort to post a bug report >>> through Gmane. >>> >>> Following up on the comment from Reinhold, could you confirm what OS >>> you are using. Also, which PDF viewer you are using? >>> >>> Could you try a different viewer? >>> >> Thanks for the suggestions and repro effort. >> >> The original printing (and viewing) was from Adobe Acrobat (pro) 9. >> Lilypond "\version 2.12" (I think), Windows. > > So it seems there is an interoperability problem between Lilypond > 2.12.2 on Windows and Acrobat 9 on Windows. > > A key aim of the Lilypond project is to produce the most beautiful > automated typesetting possible, so this sort of ugly output from an > industry standard pdf viewer is regrettable. > >> Well, I'm willing to say that Lilypond is doing his job! Thanks again. > > OK, that's good! > > There is a newer release of Lilypond, version 2.14.2 you could try: > > http://lilypond.org/download.html > > And the current development release 2.15.95 is in very good shape: > > http://lilypond.org/development.html > > I'm interested to check your pdf on a few viewers I have on my > systems. Could you send me your output pdf, please? > > Cheers, > Colin. > > -- > > Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
