David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > Matt Cary <[email protected]> writes: > >>> >>> > I'm still not clear why this is happening in the first place. Why >>> > should the revert affect an override that occurs in the following >>> > expression? >>> >>> It is not "following". Grace notes go back in time. >>> >> >> Ah, thank you. I didn't know that. I see why it's a tricky >> situation. I guess >> that means my current workaround isn't so bad after all: >> >> g8 \strumE d,8 \strumE | >> % Something weird with the strum to the grace note. >> \once \override NoteHead #'font-size = #-2 \slashedGrace a'16( b8) > > Ugh. At any rate, for this kind of situation using a separate voice > seems preferable. You can, if I remember correctly, change the > associated voice in the middle of Lyrics. This kind of thing is why I > actually prefer to just manually specify the note durations in lyrics > rather than using \lyricsto. Hardly more work and quite more robust > with regard to juggling around with voices and context.
Though there is something to be said for only ever having to enter the text for Latin mass once. I doubt, however, that one can express all details of melismata and word repetition in the note part only. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
