Hi Colin, Keith and Walter, On 22/11/12 09:19, Colin Hall wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:08:52AM +0000, Keith OHara wrote: >> Werner LEMBERG <wl <at> gnu.org> writes: >> >>> This time I tried with current git (commit 436824b8): >>> >>>> ../flower/include/interval.hh:226: T Interval_t<T>::center() >>>> const [with T = double]: Assertion `!is_empty ()' failed. > > Thanks for the report, Werner. > >>> I'm on a GNU/Linux box, running `autogen.sh' with >>> `--disable-optimising', and compiling with g++ 4.6.2. >>> >> >> The released builds are not compiled this way, so no-one can >> reproduce your bug without using Linux to create a debug-enabled >> build. I would guess that readers of bug-lilypond are more >> interested in helping to record bugs that affect released builds >> (I am , at least). > > Keith is correct. This is a bug report against unreleased code so > we can't create a tracker for it.
Colin, you're right to tell the -user list we shouldn't raise a tracker against the releases prior to current development, but it looks like we have got a problem in the development cycle. > > I'm forwarding this thread to lilypond-devel as it may be of > interest to the devs. > Werner, if this is reproducible it will need a tracker and patch and everything to go through the review process. (I realize you probably know this). Just want to make sure all your sleuthing doesn't get lost. Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
