James <[email protected]> writes: > On 12/11/13 13:56, David Kastrup wrote: >> David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:15:29AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: >>>>> I've tried building lilypond-2.17.28 with libc++, the new standard c++ >>>>> library for use with llvm (http://libcxx.llvm.org/). >>>>> >>>>> I have a build failure I don't really know how to fix, it is: >>>> I just saw that 2.17.95 is out. >>>> It still has the same error. >>> Sure. Why should't it? >> I'm currently starting to lose track of a number of issues that are >> being discussed here but not entered into the tracker. Is the bug squad >> fully functional at the moment? > > I am not bug squad, but I have created > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3656
Thanks. I'm really bad at making the admittedly mostly trivial and/or inconsequential decisions for administrative tasks like that, and once I have three different tasks to prioritize, I get into panic and deadlocks. So a working bug squad does a _lot_ for letting me stay focused on that kind of work I am actually good at: fixing stuff. Inventing stuff. Organizing/filing, in contrast, makes me shut down. Stupid, I know. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
