"Trevor Daniels" <[email protected]> writes: > Urs Liska wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 9:06 PM > >> Am 1. November 2014 21:55:01 MEZ, schrieb Trevor Daniels >> <[email protected]>: >>> >>>Thomas Morley wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:05 PM >>> >>>> Using d1*3/4\rest has a draw-back: >>>> The rest will change it's position, if \transpose is used. >>> >>>Copying to bug list. This seems like a bug to me. Do others agree? I >>>can't see a relevant issue in the tracker. >> >> Is it not desired behaviour that a pitched rest is affected by >> transposition? >> I find thst very plausible. > > This is the sort of problem I had in mind: > > { b'1 b'1\rest > \transpose d c { > b'1 b'1\rest > } > } > > Trevor
I suppose that is partly my fault. In the discussion with pitches rests in irregularly lined staves, Pál went out of his way to snap to the next line, and I voted for just taking the user at his word. In the context of transpositions by an even-called interval in a regular staff, well... So we probably need some minimal snapping after all. Or the snapping is triggered by the transposition, but I don't think that would be a good idea since transpose can work even inside of chords and overrides don't belong there. Or we need at least one manually settable property that will cause snapping. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
