David Kastrup wrote Sunday, November 02, 2014 7:38 AM
> "Trevor Daniels" <[email protected]> writes: > >> Urs Liska wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 9:06 PM >> >>> Am 1. November 2014 21:55:01 MEZ, schrieb Trevor Daniels >>> <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>Thomas Morley wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:05 PM >>>> >>>>> Using d1*3/4\rest has a draw-back: >>>>> The rest will change it's position, if \transpose is used. >>>> >>>> Copying to bug list. This seems like a bug to me. Do others agree? I >>>> can't see a relevant issue in the tracker. >>> >>> Is it not desired behaviour that a pitched rest is affected by >>> transposition? >>> I find thst very plausible. >> >> This is the sort of problem I had in mind: >> >> { b'1 b'1\rest >> \transpose d c { >> b'1 b'1\rest >> } >> } >> > I suppose that is partly my fault. In the discussion with pitches rests > in irregularly lined staves, Pál went out of his way to snap to the next > line, and I voted for just taking the user at his word. In the context > of transpositions by an even-called interval in a regular staff, well... > > So we probably need some minimal snapping after all. Or the snapping is > triggered by the transposition, but I don't think that would be a good > idea since transpose can work even inside of chords and overrides don't > belong there. Or we need at least one manually settable property that > will cause snapping. Ah, yes. That discussion's documented in Issue 2249. So there is a relevant issue already in the tracker - marked Needs-evidence. I think we have it now. Trevor _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
