On 27.10.2015 14:00, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 27.10.2015 02:04, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-10-27 0:00 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht <[email protected]>:
Hello,

I’ve taken the liberty of creating
<https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4645/>, but I’m not quite sure if it will be agreed to be a valid request. Please give your opinions.

TIA, Simon

Basically you suggest to create a post-event-command doing (pseudo-code):

{
   \set autoBeaming = ##f
   notes
   first-note-of-melisma
-\command-to-start-melisma-and-nice-autobeaming -\other-post-events
   more-notes
   last-not-of-melisma -\command-to-end-melisma-and-nice-auto-beaming
-\other-post-events
   other-notes
}

Correct, that would be the goal. But after some more essays and thinking I see that it’s no use to try it the way I tried. Consequently, I purged the ‘auto-beaming’ part from the issue, which now is only about making \melisma consistent with "(" &c., i.e. generate an event.

There is now <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4646/> for the ‘utopy’ :-)
Yours, Simon

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to