On 27.10.2015 14:08, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 27.10.2015 14:00, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 27.10.2015 02:04, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-10-27 0:00 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht <[email protected]>:
Hello,
I’ve taken the liberty of creating
<https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4645/>, but I’m
not quite
sure if it will be agreed to be a valid request. Please give your
opinions.
TIA, Simon
Basically you suggest to create a post-event-command doing
(pseudo-code):
{
\set autoBeaming = ##f
notes
first-note-of-melisma
-\command-to-start-melisma-and-nice-autobeaming -\other-post-events
more-notes
last-not-of-melisma -\command-to-end-melisma-and-nice-auto-beaming
-\other-post-events
other-notes
}
Correct, that would be the goal. But after some more essays and
thinking I see that it’s no use to try it the way I tried.
Consequently, I purged the ‘auto-beaming’ part from the issue, which
now is only about making \melisma consistent with "(" &c., i.e.
generate an event.
There is now <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4646/>
for the ‘utopy’ :-)
Or rather ‘long-term vision’.
Yours, Simon
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
