Am 20.04.2016 um 10:44 schrieb Phil Holmes: > "Simon Albrecht" <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote in message > news:5716a647.7070...@mail.de... >> On 19.04.2016 15:02, Phil Holmes wrote: >>> "Gilberto Agostinho" <gilbertohasn...@googlemail.com> wrote in >>> message news:57161fa5.7000...@gmail.com... >>>> Hello bug squad, >>>> >>>> When using the accidental style dodecaphonic-no-repeat, the >>>> accidental of repeated notes aren't restated unless there is a bar >>>> line in between them. The problem I found is that when using a mid >>>> bar break (by using the command \bar "" \break in the middle of a >>>> bar), the accidental is not restated between repeated notes that >>>> happen to be around the break. See: >>>> >>>> \version "2.19.37" >>>> >>>> \relative c' { >>>> \accidentalStyle dodecaphonic-no-repeat >>>> cis d e cis | \break >>>> cis d e cis | >>>> } >>>> >>>> \relative c' { >>>> \accidentalStyle dodecaphonic-no-repeat >>>> \time 8/4 >>>> cis d e cis \bar "" \break >>>> cis d e cis | >>>> } >>>> >>>> Producing: http://s17.postimg.org/f6s6k96zz/accidental.jpg >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Gilberto >>> >>> That seems perfectly correct. There is no bar line in your second >>> example, so why should the accidental be restated? >> >> Perhaps because it demands really much from the performer to remember >> accidentals across line breaks, in such complicated music as will >> likely use the dodecaphonic-no-repeat accidental style. >> Making this rather an enhancement request. >> >> Best, Simon > > I would have said that if the typesetter has gone to the lengths of > adding a manual blank barline and a break, forcing an accidental with > ! would not be a problem.
+1 But: What if there is an invisible barline to *allow* a mid-measure break but no explicit \break? However, I would not bother adding this, maybe a remark in the NR, or a "known warning" entry? Urs _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
