Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>: >> Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving >> the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the >> typesetter's preference. > > It's clearly a bug. See this small (not tiny) example plus comments > from my earlier post at > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-placement-td188833.html#a188851 > > %% Following note is moved away by DynamicText > %% > %% Bad behaviour goes away if the second note has no Accidental > %% or \voiceTwo is used > %% or if \new StaffGroup is deleted or replaced by \new ChoirStaff > %% \new GrandStaff does not work as well, though > %% > %% Worked fine with "2.18.2" > > \version "2.19.38"
Is the cause known or should I try to bisect it to a particular commit? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
