"David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote in message
news:87mvog3f7z....@fencepost.gnu.org...
Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>:
Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down?
Moving
the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the
typesetter's preference.
It's clearly a bug. See this small (not tiny) example plus comments
from my earlier post at
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-placement-td188833.html#a188851
%% Following note is moved away by DynamicText
%%
%% Bad behaviour goes away if the second note has no Accidental
%% or \voiceTwo is used
%% or if \new StaffGroup is deleted or replaced by \new ChoirStaff
%% \new GrandStaff does not work as well, though
%%
%% Worked fine with "2.18.2"
\version "2.19.38"
Is the cause known or should I try to bisect it to a particular commit?
--
David Kastrup
The behaviour changed between 18.2 and 19.2
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
