Torsten Hämmerle <> writes:

> Noeck wrote
>> I don’t know the internals enough, but isn’t it plausible that things
>> like finding the optimal line break etc. have a n² complexity
>> ("squared").
> Hi Joram,
> On the one hand, that sounds plausible, underpinned by David's evaluations.
> But I find it very interesting that it takes significantly less time if you
> replace the s4. by an R4.

s4. can be condensed almost arbitrarily.  You can fit several dozens of
measures in one line then if you want to.

David Kastrup

bug-lilypond mailing list

Reply via email to