Torsten Hämmerle <torsten.haemme...@web.de> writes: > Noeck wrote >> I don’t know the internals enough, but isn’t it plausible that things >> like finding the optimal line break etc. have a n² complexity >> ("squared"). > > Hi Joram, > > On the one hand, that sounds plausible, underpinned by David's evaluations. > But I find it very interesting that it takes significantly less time if you > replace the s4. by an R4.
s4. can be condensed almost arbitrarily. You can fit several dozens of measures in one line then if you want to. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond