Hi!
Kostik wrote:
> 2. I think that in my application has memory leak.
It seems that here is a memory leaks:
--- ./rfc2047.c.orig 2010-04-12 17:25:22.000000000 +0400
+++ ./rfc2047.c 2010-04-14 14:22:54.065990600 +0400
@@ -176,6 +176,9 @@
mu_stream_close (filter);
mu_stream_destroy (&filter, mu_stream_get_owner (filter));
+ mu_stream_close (in_stream);
+ mu_stream_destroy (&in_stream, mu_stream_get_owner (in_stream));
fromstr = sp + 1;
run_count = 1;
@@ -186,6 +189,11 @@
{
run_count++;
fromstr++;
+ free (fromcode);
+ free (encoding_type);
+ free (encoded_text);
continue;
}
else
--
It is not working patch because duble free is possible with fromcode,
encoding_type and encoded_text. But it shows the location of possible problems.
And valgrind show about two more leaks:
---
==5922== 160 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 23 of 26
==5922== at 0x40237D8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==5922== by 0x8066AEF: mu_filter_iconv_create (filter_iconv.c:430)
==5922== by 0x80593AF: mu_decode_filter (mutil.c:1331)
==5922== by 0x805EBAE: mu_rfc2047_decode (rfc2047.c:163)
==5922== by 0x8057051: mu_mimehdr_decode_param (mimehdr.c:430)
==5922== by 0x805782C: mu_message_aget_decoded_attachment_name
(mimehdr.c:636)
and
==5922== 3,151 (40 direct, 3,111 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 26 of 26
==5922== at 0x4022BB5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418)
==5922== by 0x804EC76: mu_filter_create (filter.c:210)
==5922== by 0x805934F: mu_decode_filter (mutil.c:1324)
==5922== by 0x805EBAE: mu_rfc2047_decode (rfc2047.c:163)
==5922== by 0x8057051: mu_mimehdr_decode_param (mimehdr.c:430)
==5922== by 0x805782C: mu_message_aget_decoded_attachment_name
(mimehdr.c:636)
---
=kostik
_______________________________________________
Bug-mailutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
