Hi! Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > Fixed. > Ditto for these two (they were related, actually). > Please, pull dbbf8dae, and thanks for reporting!
Oh, Sergey, very sorry! I have written my previous message earlier than read your response. :) I took the last git. It seems the one leak still exist: --- ==14540== 3,399 (40 direct, 3,359 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 28 of 28 ==14540== at 0x4022BB5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) ==14540== by 0x804ECAF: mu_filter_create (filter.c:211) ==14540== by 0x805937F: mu_decode_filter (mutil.c:1324) ==14540== by 0x805EB07: mu_rfc2047_decode (rfc2047.c:164) ==14540== by 0x8057081: mu_mimehdr_decode_param (mimehdr.c:430) ==14540== by 0x805785C: mu_message_aget_decoded_attachment_name (mimehdr.c:636) --- When mu_filter_iconv_create() is called, then filter_destroy() - no. =kostik _______________________________________________ Bug-mailutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
