On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 17:29:33 -0500 Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> wrote: > It turns out to be innocuous because none of the callers care that the > value of the input string is modified if we return a different string, > but it's still wrong and should be fixed.
If so, the easy and more correct fix might be to to remove const from the function variable declarations rather than to restore the value. > Thanks for noticing! This Thanks mostly goes to Joe Filion who initally noticed this. Best regards Henrik
