On Sun, 09 Jan 2022 10:17:10 -0500 Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> wrote: > In any event, the bug still exists whether you say the argument is > const or not: the expectation when this function is called is that > after it returns the string passed to it has the same content as before > it was called.
If so I agree that the best quick and easy fix would be to restore the original value. A fix involving more work would be to copy the const input string to some temporary string that the function is free to alter as it wants. Best regards Henrik
