Sure, it’s page 374 of 387.

Jakub


st 3. 9. 2025 v 0:11 odesílatel Thomas Dickey <[email protected]> napsal:

> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 10:57:22PM +0200, Jakub Horký wrote:
> > út 2. 9. 2025 v 11:30 odesílatel Thomas Dickey <[email protected]> napsal:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 01:18:21PM +0200, Jakub Horký wrote:
> > > > po 1. 9. 2025 v 2:17 odesílatel Thomas Dickey <[email protected]>
> napsal:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 01:53:44PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 02:54:16PM +0200, Jakub Horký wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've made several fixes in terminfo:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *1) Abandon ancient vt100+keypad mapping for "cross" keypad
> keys,
> > > unify
> > > > > > > vt100+keypad and vt220+keypad, and include extended caps for
> them*
> > > > >
> > > > > by the way, extended caps aren't visible to termcap users, and
> moving
> > > > > the standard (not the extended) caps around would impact them.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, vim (noting that it has builtin stuff, but still a
> > > problem)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I know, but even termcap-based apps can't rely on termcap if it gives
> > > them
> > > > malformed cap definitions for some random subset of terminals. It's
> nice
> > >
> > > ...see report.  Keep in mind that the changes you suggest are untested,
> > > amounting to more than 3500 differences.
> >
> >
> > Yes, these are all the terminals that map the keys incorrectly with
> respect
> > to the documentation. Even the System V R2 documentation expected a
> > different mapping:
> >
> >
> https://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/att/unix/System_V_Release_2/307-113_UNIX_System_V_Release_2.0_Programmer_Reference_Manual_DEC_Processors_Apr1984.pdf
> >
> > This is a very, very longstanding error.
>
> That's a 397-page document.  Perhaps you could be more specific, e.g.,
> by providing a page number and quoting text, and noting where you believe
> it differs.
>
> --
> Thomas E. Dickey <[email protected]>
> https://invisible-island.net
>

Reply via email to