Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Petr Uzel <petr.u...@suse.cz> wrote: > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:00:08PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > >> > > >> -AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.15]) > > >> +AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18]) > > > > > > Shouldn't this be [0.17] ? ^^^^ > > > > Good catch. Thanks. > > > > That would make it match the log. > > Would my requiring 0.18 cause trouble for you personally? > > SUSE, which I use on my development system, has gettext-0.17 and won't > update it anytime soon (we are in version freeze for 11.3). > > So sticking to gettext-0.17 would make it easier for me, but if you > decide to require 0.18, I'll cope with that. > > I think that require an update that give us no gain is bad. I'd prefer that > 0.17 > was use until 0.18 is more commonly available in distros.
I wouldn't have suggested using 0.18 if it were for no gain. However 0.17 is adequate, so we'll require only that, for now. _______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted