Tobias, 2014-11-24 19:51 GMT+01:00 Tobias Stoeckmann <tob...@stoeckmann.org>: > as the subject says, lin should be ssize_t instead of off_t. This > works on Linux systems I have seen, because sizeof(size_t) is basically > always sizeof(off_t). I don't know if there are 32 bit Linux systems > with a 64 bit off_t ...
this depends on the _FILE_OFFSET_BITS macro. > Without such a switch, way too large lins are parsed without errors, > exceeding limits in various parts of the source. Shouldn't we instead fix the code where it is currently broken? Thanks, Andreas
